No current price: no retailer we track lists it right now.
22 facts in comparison
The cheap default against the do-it-once option, with Cat 6 sitting unmentioned between them. Cat 5e is thinner, more flexible, easier to terminate and carries 2.5 Gigabit across a full run - genuinely enough for a modern access point and for most home networks. Cat 6a carries 10 Gigabit across the same 100 metres, is specified against alien crosstalk in dense bundles, and costs more in money and in stiffness.
The distance rows are the whole story. At gigabit and 2.5 Gigabit the two are indistinguishable over any run a building will have. At 10 Gigabit, Cat 5e cannot participate at all, and Cat 6a is the category that does it properly at full length. Cat 6a also carries the higher bandwidth rating that future multi-gig standards are written against.
The cost of Cat 6a is physical more than financial. It is noticeably thicker, harder to pull through a tight conduit, and harder to dress into a small wall box, and its shielded variants are stiffer again. For a house being wired once, that is a few awkward afternoons; for a patch cord behind a desk, it is pointless.
The mistake in one direction is wiring walls with Cat 5e to save a little and re-pulling them the day 10 Gigabit arrives. The mistake in the other is buying Cat 6a patch cords for a gigabit desktop and gaining nothing but stiffness.
The sensible split: Cat 5e for patch leads and for any run that is easy to replace, Cat 6a for anything inside a wall, under a floor or in a conduit that will still be there in fifteen years. If the runs are short and the walls are open, Cat 6 splits the difference; if they are long and the walls are closing, Cat 6a is the cable to regret least.
The gap between these two categories is wider in the installation than in the specification, and that is the part buyers consistently under-weight. Cat 6a is a physically demanding cable. It is thicker, it fights tight conduit bends, it eats space in a patch panel, and the shielded versions are stiffer again and need grounded hardware at both ends to be worth having at all. None of that appears in a comparison table, and all of it appears on the day you install it.
Cat 5e's weakness is equally practical rather than theoretical. It is not slow for a house today. It becomes a problem at the single moment someone wants the highest tier of speed, and at that moment it is not a small problem, because the remedy is a re-pull rather than an adapter.
So the two failure modes are asymmetric: over-buying costs an awkward afternoon and some extra money, under-buying costs you the wall. Anyone genuinely torn should notice that asymmetry and lean accordingly. Anyone buying patch cords should ignore all of it and buy the cheap ones.
Head-to-head points: every spec is scaled between these products only, so a product can score high here and modestly on its own page, where the VS Score measures it against the median of its class.
No standout advantages.
The spec sheet pulls in both directions. These are the gaps big enough to shape the decision — with the actual figures, and what each one means in real-world use.
The fastest Ethernet speed this cable category is rated to carry.
The signal frequency the cable is tested to; more headroom means more speed and fewer errors on a long run.
The standard sets limits for interference between neighbouring cables in a bundle — the failure mode that breaks 10 Gigabit in real trunking.
There is no single answer — it depends on what you will actually use it for. Match your priority to the pick below.
Drag the sliders to weight each category and re-rank the products to suit your priorities.
Specs last verified October 11, 2026Cat5e Ethernet Cable: 22 of 28 specs verified (79%)Cat6a Ethernet Cable: 22 of 28 specs verified (79%)Unverified specs show as Unknown — never estimated, never scored
Both of these are defensible, and the wrong one is only wrong in a specific place. For anything you can reach and swap, Cat 5e remains the sensible default and the thinner cable is easier to live with. For anything being sealed into a building, Cat 6a is the category you will regret least.
If you are wiring a house once, the money is not really in the cable at all. It is in the labour and the disruption, and those are identical whichever category you pull. That is the argument for the better cable, and it is a stronger one than any performance row in the table.
If your walls are already open and the runs are short, Cat 6 sits reasonably between them and nobody will fault you for choosing it.