No current price: no retailer we track lists it right now.
22 facts in comparison
Cat6 Ethernet Cable vs Cat6a Ethernet Cable
One letter apart, and the whole question is distance. Both categories carry 10 Gigabit Ethernet; Cat 6 does it for 55 metres, Cat 6a for the full 100 metres that every other Ethernet speed gets. At gigabit, 2.5 and 5 Gigabit the two are indistinguishable over any run a building will have.
The second difference is quieter and matters in one place: Cat 6a is specified for alien crosstalk, the interference between neighbouring cables in a bundle. In a home with three cables in a wall that is academic. In a riser or a tray carrying dozens of runs at 10 Gigabit, it is the reason the standard exists.
The costs of the "a" are physical. Cat 6a is thicker, stiffer, harder to pull through tight conduit and harder to dress into a small wall box, and it costs more per metre. Cat 6 is easier to work with and cheaper, and for the majority of home runs - which are under 55 metres and rarely 10 Gigabit - it is enough.
Where the choice genuinely bites is future-proofing a run that is expensive to redo. A cable inside a finished wall or under a floor will outlive several generations of switches; if there is any prospect of 10 Gigabit across a long run, Cat 6a costs a little more once and never needs revisiting. For patch cords, the choice barely exists.
The rule of thumb this comparison supports: Cat 6 for short in-wall runs and all patch cables, Cat 6a for long runs, dense bundles, and anywhere the cable will be inaccessible once installed. Buying 6a everywhere is not wrong, just stiffer and dearer than it needs to be.
Editor’s note
Cat 6 is the better-judged product of the two for most buyers, because its weakness sits exactly where ordinary networks do not go. Published in 2002, it carries 5 Gigabit across a full-length run and 10 Gigabit across the shorter ones a house actually contains, in a jacket that terminates quickly and turns corners without a fight. Its quiet compromise is that it carries no alien crosstalk specification at all, so its distance rating is a bench figure. Bundle dozens of runs into a single tray and the number printed on the box stops being the number that governs.
Cat 6a fixes precisely that, and charges for it in millimetres. The 2008 revision is what cabling contractors reach for because it removes an argument, not because the client needed the bandwidth, and the honest reading is that many of its buyers are insuring against a future that never arrives. It is thicker, it fights shallow back boxes, and terminating it properly takes longer than the cheaper cable does.
Walk past Cat 6a if the job is patch leads, or wiring a flat somebody else owns. Walk past Cat 6 if the run is going behind plaster, under a floor, or into a bundle with dozens of neighbours, because that is the one place its missing specification stops being theoretical.
Head-to-head points: every spec is scaled between these products only, so a product can score high here and modestly on its own page, where the VS Score measures it against the median of its class.
Where the Cat6 Ethernet Cable beats the Cat6a Ethernet Cable
No standout advantages.
Where the Cat6a Ethernet Cable beats the Cat6 Ethernet Cable
- A much higher bandwidth ?500 MHz vs 250 MHz
- A much higher reach at top speed ?100 m vs 55 m
- A much higher 10 Gigabit reach ?100 m vs 55 m
- Has alien crosstalk limits ?
Key real-world differences
The spec sheet pulls in both directions. These are the gaps big enough to shape the decision — with the actual figures, and what each one means in real-world use.
- BandwidthSpeed & reach250 MHz vs 500 MHz — 2× more for the Cat6a Ethernet Cable
The signal frequency the cable is tested to; more headroom means more speed and fewer errors on a long run.
- Alien crosstalk limitsConstruction & shieldingNo vs Yes — only the Cat6a Ethernet Cable has it
The standard sets limits for interference between neighbouring cables in a bundle — the failure mode that breaks 10 Gigabit in real trunking.
- 10 Gigabit reachSpeed & reach55 m vs 100 m — 81.8% more for the Cat6a Ethernet Cable
How far the cable carries 10GBASE-T. Zero means the category is not rated for 10 Gigabit at all.
Which one should you buy?
There is no single answer — it depends on what you will actually use it for. Match your priority to the pick below.
- Best for speed & reach Cat6a Ethernet Cable takes the category 100 to 57 — driven by bandwidth (250 MHz vs 500 MHz).
- Best for construction & shielding Cat6a Ethernet Cable takes the category 100 to 60 — driven by alien crosstalk limits (No vs Yes).
- The safe all-rounder Cat6a Ethernet Cable wins 2 of 4 categories and tops the overall VS Score at 100.
Where each one falls short
Cat6 Ethernet Cable
- Bandwidth: 250 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Alien crosstalk limits: No vs Yes
- 10 Gigabit reach: 55 m vs 100 m
- 6 specs are unreported (shown as Unknown) and excluded from its scores.
Cat6a Ethernet Cable
- No major spec weaknesses in this matchup — the gaps that exist are small.
- 6 specs are unreported (shown as Unknown) and excluded from its scores.
What matters to you?
Drag the sliders to weight each category and re-rank the products to suit your priorities.
Score breakdown
Speed & reach
Construction & shielding
Power & connectors
Standards & status
Specs last verified October 11, 2026Cat6 Ethernet Cable: 22 of 28 specs verified (79%)Cat6a Ethernet Cable: 22 of 28 specs verified (79%)Unverified specs show as Unknown — never estimated, never scored
What reviewers say
The bottom line
Buy Cat 6a when the labour of installing the cable costs more than the cable itself, and Cat 6 whenever it does not. That single test settles most of these purchases. Pulling through a finished wall, a ceiling void or a conduit that would have to be opened again is expensive work, and paying once for the tighter 500 MHz specification is cheaper than repeating it. Surface trunking, patch leads and anything replaceable on a Saturday afternoon does not need it.
The trade-off that decides it is handling rather than performance. Cat 6a's extra jacket and larger bend radius slow terminations down and refuse to sit neatly in a shallow back box, and very little in a normal house exercises the headroom it buys. Contractors default to it because they are pricing labour they would rather not repeat.